joeblog

Just another Edublogs.org weblog

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’


First year reflection

Reflection on First Year of Tlite

 

 

 

My journey through the halls (virtual halls) of Tlite has been filled with ups and downs, challenges and triumphs, tears and hallelujahs.  I have learnewd a lot from other group members, mentors, “the internet”, and most surprisingly, from myself.  The way things have gone is a portal through which I can reflect and improve my teaching practice.  I feel like my teaching has already improved and the future is so bright I gotta wear shades!

So what did I do during my year in Tlite?  I facilitated several exciting topic areas for exploration with my students.  We looked at using a publishing program to better present the Scientific method.  We looked at assessment software that better enabled them to keep track of their own learning and take a leading role in what is happening in the classroom and how they fit into that experience.  We looked at using video software to “relearn” a concept after a hands-on experience and solidify student learned concepts.  We also used a personal response system to assess in the classroom learning as it is happening!  

The particulars of what we did could fill volumes.  The real important part of the experience is how it changed me as a teacher and how it has helped my students to be part of a richer, more competent learning journey.  

My own learning styles come into play whenever I reflect on teaching methodologies and how they change. I am interested in providing a richer experience for my students while I am delivering content. I have some talents that I think make me good at my job as a teacher.  I have a good sense of humour; at least I can make my students laugh a lot.  This makes them like me.  Does that mean I am a good teacher?  I can diffuse many tricky situations with humour.  I can also lighten the day of a colleague with humour.  I can also make light of the times I forget to holepunch or hand back a test.

 I believe that I am very competent in teaching Sciences and I have a very solid understanding of the topic areas.  However, I would like to provide a more rich experience To my students when delivering the curriculum.  I am a teacher who is at heart a performer.  I ove to be at the front of the classroom.  I have genuine, heartfelt relationships with students.  For the most part, studnets like my teaching style and I get along with almost all of them famously.  However, I wonder at times if my teaching is the best way for students to learn.  This is reqally the main basis for all my inquiries in Tlite.  How can I help my studetns to learn better?

I do explain things well, at least things about Science or Math.  Many students have told me this.  Once a student said to me, “Mr. Espenhain, you are the only teacher who actually teaches us.”  I took this comment with a grain of salt because I know there are many competent teachers in our building.  It did, however, really make me think about teaching and what it means to teach.

To finish, I am constantly reflecting.  I learn from feedback.  The students in high school can be very vocal.  They often tell me outright what I’m doing well and what I need to improve on.  They don’t hesitate!  However, one must filter this barrage of criticism, both positive and negative.  I have had a student tell me I am the greatest teacher right after I said their homework was no longer due.  Motivation tells a story.  Much of what the students tell me during and after class is very useful feedback and supplies me with an opportunity to change and improve my teaching.  And that is the whole point!

Autbiography

Autobiography

 

Teacher 

            I am a teacher who loves to learn and to bring my own learning into the classroom.  My learning style is kinesthetic and very much hands on.  I am a spatial learner and love to solve problems involving physical space.  I think this is why I am involved in Science.  I love to take things apart.  Not only do I love to piece together a micromanipulator to inject DNA into an oocyte, but I also like to play with ideas in a spatial way.  When I teach I deconstruct an idea or concept and then put it back together again for the kids.  I really enjoy giving my students an opportunity to complete hands on activities and to explore the physical properties of nature and man-made objects.  I also often have my students think in this way.  They have the opportunity to manipulate ideas, concepts, facts, and figures.  I try to teach them to not only remember things but understand how they work.  If my students can take an idea and work with it in order to understand it fully and completely so they can apply that idea to some new situation, then my job is well done.

Reflective Teacher    

            While I am teaching I am constantly reflecting.  I learn from feedback.  The students in high school can be very vocal.  They often tell me outright what I’m doing well and what I need to improve on.  They don’t hesitate!  However, one must filter this barrage of criticism, both positive and negative.  I have had a student tell me I am the greatest teacher right after I said their homework was no longer due.  Motivation tells a story.  Much of what the students tell me during and after class is very useful feedback and supplies me with an opportunity to change and improve my teaching

Learning Moments

            I am triggered by epiphanies.  I sometimes have aha! Moments that give me a big shift in pedagogy.  These moments strike me when a student comes up with a profound comment or when I am inspired by a competent colleague.  These moments often result in a change in the way I teach.  Changes in practical teaching methodologies have varying results. Some things work and some things don’t.  Continual reflection on changing teaching practices is essential for building a teaching style that works; not only for me, but for my students.  I know when I have learned something because I see a change in my own behaviour and often in the learning of my students.  Sometimes positive and sometimes negative.  I respond accordingly and this is how my teaching style and strategies are shaped. 

 

My Field Study Question

 

How can different types of assessment influence student understanding and attitudes towards learning?

 

Subquestions

Types of assessment?

Formative vs. summative

Ongoing vs. at the end

Self assessment

Peer assessment

Quiz show

Clickers

Curriculum based tests

Class based assessment

 

 How do I define understanding?

How do I measure a level of understanding?

Can I make assessment based on individual students?

 

Facebook Study Groups: Cheating?

This is an article about Chris Avenir, a student at Ryerson who managed a facebook study group.  He was accused of cheating and threatened with expulsion.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080318.wlfacebook18/

BNStory/PersonalTech/home?cid=al_gam_mostemail

My opinion:

I started out thinking that this was ridiculous behaviour by Ryerson.  Why would they expel someone who is using technology to reach out and learn cooperatively with other students?  As I read  the article though, I became aware of several subtleties around this issue. 

When one thinks about study groups of students working together, physically in the same room, one can argue that the facebook group is exactly the same.  So what’s wrong with that? 

Well, the problem is, a traditional study group may be flawed to start with.  It’s a matter of student understanding.  If the hypothetical brick and mortar study group is a bunch of students who are working together to solve problems and are gaining understanding, then we’re golden.  Great situation.  Same with the facebook group.  However, if the group is one in which one or more students are simply providing answers and the others are copying it, we have a problem.  Students copying answers are not gaining understanding.  I don’t want to have a doctor or a lawyer who worked her way through school copying answers from someone else.  I want the doctor who has done the work herself and has an intimate understanding of the concepts involved.

Now, the thing is, we all know that flawed study groups have always existed.  Schools have never done anything about it because…well because its pretty near impossible to stop it.  Some kids will always be willing to give away the answers and some kids will always want to copy them.  It’s a problem whether in a library or in a facebook group.

The Answer:

Ryerson should forget about trying to stop facebook groups.  We as educators are not ever going to have the resources necessary to stop all the student copying that goes on.  Fortunately there is another way.  Evaluation should be based on understanding.  Give students chemistry problems and let them copy solutions if they want to – heck – give them the answers with the problems.  Just don’t evaluate those problems, but evaluate a similar set of problems that will judge an individual student’s understanding of the concepts involved.  Evaluation should be based on ain individual student’s understanding.

Copying answers will not help a student prepare for these types of evaluations and will force students to attempt problems on their own and learn the material for themselves.  That is what education has always been, and always will be, about.

 

Chester, A. and Gwynne, G. (December, 1998). Online Teaching: Encouraging Collaboration through Anonymity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication

Karayan, S. and Crowe, J. (April, 1997). Student Perceptions of Electronic Discussion Groups. T.H.E. Journal

Pardee, M. (June, 1996). Using E-Mail, Web Sites & Newsgroups to Enhance Traditional Classroom Instruction. T.H.E. Journal, 23, 1

The Empowerment Age: Why the Internet Matters. Situation Analysis by EchoDitto, Inc. A 2004 Year End Report

Full Disclosure: Josh Goldstein is Associate Director and Jeremy Goldberg is Executive Director of GYPA.

 

Hello world!

Welcome to Edublogs.org. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!